Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 14:37 (GMT) Post subject:
And my fellow citizens of v/o land, let me be the first (second) to start out this caucus... uh, er.... thread, with a discussion on the need for CHANGES!
(be sure to watch all the way thru)
_________________ Scott R. Pollak Warm. Real. Natural. www.voicebyscott.com
SaVoa 07003
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 14:39 (GMT) Post subject:
The average was 2.4 on the "Makeit" auditions Scott. Kinda tells me that nobody even got close to what they were looking for, which also tells me they didn't explain it very well.
(the other thread where you asked is locked) _________________ SaVoa #07025
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 18:49 (GMT) Post subject:
Deby, funny you mention that about McCain. I was back stage at a late night show he was doing last year, and I saw the sound engineer actually working feverishly before air time to clean up his esses! _________________ Diane
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 19:54 (GMT) Post subject:
I haven't had much to post recently either because I missed 'em or they just didn't come my way, but here's a couple that I just put together. The PHH got me a harsh '2' with a 2.9 average, but I think it's really better than that. There wasn't much in the way of instruction. Can anybody tell me why they might have given it a 2?
"Hey, it's Alex" is for a video game and I don't know the results yet.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 21:22 (GMT) Post subject:
Was there direction included?
Here's what - I - heard. A slow - ness - of pace. A lot of air in here. And there was a very odd elongation of the word "results" near the top. It went on for quite a while.
Overall, it was also very formal in the delivery. I felt a bit like I was being preached at instead of part of the team. Loosen up a bit, connect with the words.
These are not easy to read, so you really have to get into the relationship between you and the listener. Err on the side of conversationality - that will help you understand the intent and then you can inject more formality if it is necessary. _________________ Connie Terwilliger - New Yorker Cartoon SaVoa #07013
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 21:55 (GMT) Post subject:
David Bosco wrote:
The PHH got me a harsh '2' with a 2.9 average, but I think it's really better than that. There wasn't much in the way of instruction. Can anybody tell me why they might have given it a 2?
A harsh 2 for mine as well. I can only surmise that the reason is, if they have an idea what sort of read they wanted, they either didn't know how to convey it in their instructions, or they kept that info to themselves.
Here's all they said, "Estimated 3 minute multimedia presentation covering our exciting new process improvement initiative. No sound effects or background music required."
I guess David and I were not as excited about this as they were.
And Deby -- I feel so relaxed, I almost forgot about getting worked up about getting a 2.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 23:01 (GMT) Post subject:
Connie:
Before submitting the PHH, I had another take that was faster in pace, but I thought it was too hurried, so I slowed it down but really just a bit. In reality, perhaps the faster one would not have been too fast at all.
My reason for slowing down on "Rally for Results" was to emphasize the title of their customer satisfaction program rather than glossing over it too quickly. That was my intention but I guess it did drag a little to much and is a possible reason for the 2 rating.
PHH leases vehicles to corporations of all sizes and I was trying to think of the average business person who might be playing this audio/video and how they might like to hear it. Most probably wouldn't remember the name of another company's customer satisfaction program launched five years ago.
But thank you for your observations, I'll keep them in mind.
Lee:
Don't know why they didn't like your PHH so well other than the missing rah-rah, which they didn't even ask for.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2008, 23:54 (GMT) Post subject:
Scott Pollak wrote:
And my fellow citizens of v/o land, let me be the first (second) to start out this caucus... uh, er.... thread, with a discussion on the need for CHANGES!
What we need are people that can make change... at the fast food restaurant.
Got a nibble on this one and thought the comment via email was interensting...
Quote:
I have listened to your submission to the genealogy voice-over and you are the only one who did what I had requested. I thank you and look forward on getting in contact with you.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008, 00:47 (GMT) Post subject:
Diane Havens wrote:
That's great, Colin -- but what is it that they requested?
I think it was "genealogy music." Or...as I read it...PRODUCTION.
Now mind you, this looks like a questionable job. A school presentation of some sort. 30 seconds.. $100. I'm fine with that though, if that is indeed what happens but I have my doubts.
Sadly, this person is still shopping. The latest...
All times are GMT Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Next
Page 1 of 8
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum